Showing posts with label watercolour sketching. Show all posts
Showing posts with label watercolour sketching. Show all posts

Monday, 4 March 2013

STOP DITHERING AND GET ON WITH IT

View to the Salute, watercolour and gouache on grey tinted paper
I had to smile when I read this in a book by one of my favourite painters, Jane Corsellis.  I hope she will forgive me for using it as a blog title.

The comment was given to her one day when she asked a painter friend how she should go about painting with watercolours.  The implication behind the words is that he was inviting her to just TRY IT,  learn from her own mistakes, and glory in the discoveries she might make.

I decided to use this blog post to encourage you to think a little differently, perhaps, about how you work, in order to learn from your own mistakes and glory in some new discoveries.

Although I tend to lean towards pastels as my favourite medium, I do enjoy the look of watercolours.   However, they are not always an easy medium to use;  it takes time to become familiar with the technical issues of working with them. They have a reputation for being technically demanding, requiring careful washes and clever brushstrokes that seemingly once in place, cannot be changed ...but I have found that if I make up my mind to be a a bit more relaxed about working with them, using them in a sketchbook for example,  being a bit less precious about techniques, then some of these problems are minimised.  

Rather than produce careful finished paintings with my watercolours, I use them for location work, and since I am off to Sri Lanka next weekend, it is the medium I will most likely use while I am there.  Much as I might love, and in fact prefer my pastels, it is becoming increasingly difficult for me to carry heavy kit around, and on location these days, I mostly use sketchbook and watercolours for convenience and ease of transportation.  ALSO I do feel that the sketchbook is just for me to look at, I don't feel I have to show it to anyone, so super-careful technique and meticulous finish goes out of the window, I stop dithering, and just get on with it.

I begin often with a light pencil sketch but sometimes, this can become a crutch - something to "fill in", so I try to use as little pencil as possible - I just put the main shapes in place to be sure that I can fit my desired image on the page.  Then, I begin laying in washes, worrying not at all about "going over the lines", washes are applied quite freely - and quickly, no fiddling.  From then on, I develop the painting wash over wash, sometimes working wet-into-wet (worth practising separately, to get the hang of the amount of water on brush and water on paper), sometimes working on dry areas. 

The Italian hilltop image below was drawn initially rather more in pencil, since I felt the need to get the proportions and perspective of the buildings right.  So, having begun with pencil, I took this pencil sketch further, adding tone in various places with the pencil, you can see quite a lot of scribbles particularly under the foliage to the left!  I was not the least bit "precious" about it, it is in a sketchbook, so it did not matter what I did.    THAT's the beauty of working in a sketchbook, you can give yourself permission to work with any implements you fancy.  In this instance, rather than carefully put in twiddly foliage shapes, I  put in some long sweeping vertical strokes of colour with a big square-ended brush, to see if I liked the look.  I did. The vertical strokes echoed the long vertical shapes on some of the buildings.  Nice.


Italian Hilltop.  Pencil and watercolour in heavy cartridge paper sketchbook with off-white, creamy paper

Sometimes I will "draw" with the brush instead of using the safety net of a pencil... ..the figures in the image below were not drawn at all in pencil


country lane, Rhajastan in good quality watercolour sketchbook
Flags and rain, Venice.
Watercolour and gouache on tinted pastel paper
 I sometimes work on a tinted paper, this is fun, since I can then use some opaque white (as Turner did).  This turns the image into something more like a gouache piece.  Using opaque white  removes some of the anxiety of "reserving" the white paper for brightest lights.  Chinese White watercolour is more subtle than Gouache white, which is more opaque - do try both.

All of these images here today were worked on location.  As you can see, they are a long way from being "finished watercolour paintings" but they were SUCH fun to create, and I seriously did just get on with it.   Making lots of small studies gets the adrenalin going, and the adrenalin makes you much less tense and fearful, so your work will have a liveliness that often disappears when you are trying so very hard to get things "right". 

So, I can hear you asking.........what kind of sketchbook, or paper?
Obviously, given that you are working with water, the paper needs to be THICK.  I sometimes use good quality watercolour books;  sometimes tinted pastel paper in a spiral bound sketchbook;  sometimes I use a sketchbook with heavy cartridge paper.   Moleskin sketchbooks work quite well, if you dont mind their yellowy colour pages. I am not sure I do like them.  I prefer something greyer if I can find it. Turner produced some gorgeous images, using "body colour" and watercolours on a greenish grey tinted paper.

You can also use paper taped to a board;  for lightness, you can use Foam Core board;  tape two panels together like a sketchbook, and tape your watercolour paper (minimum 140lb, heavier better if you slosh about a lot) to both sides, then you have a very lightweight, improvised sketchbook.  The only problem with Foam Core is that sometimes it is difficult to get sticky tape off it.  So I generally prefer a very lightweight, thin plywood board.

An interesting addition to your watercolour box, could be a few watersoluble pencils.  The sketch below was done with a watersoluble graphite pencil, to give me a rather nice monochrome image. If you look carefully you can see that I worked across a double-page spread.  I often do that, then there is no way I can tear the image out to frame it!




Wool sellers, Morocco market.  Done with watersoluble pencil, washed  with water to create tonal sketch. Done in a watercolour sketchbook.


One little bit of important "technical" advice I would like to offer if you work with watercolours:  Do not muck about with an area of your picture which is DAMP.  Adding more colour means adding more water....and any area which is damp will likely be spoiled.  Always leave damp areas to dry thoroughly;  then you can add more washes without any worries.  Wet-into-wet is different....while there is a sheen on the paper, which means water on the surface, you can (carefully) add more pigment  (this does take practice to know what will happen)...but once the sheen disappears, the water sinks in and the paper becomes technically "damp", you MUST leave it to dry...no further fiddling allowed!

The "stop dithering and get on with it" advice sounds flippant, but honestly, it works.  When you throw caution to the winds, and just have a go without being too precious, or super-careful,  or most importantly,  worrying about what others might say or think, you can often surprise yourself with some enjoyable results.  I will not be able to frame any of my sketchbook work, but years later, looking at these pictures takes me right back to their moment of creation. I remember the chill of the wind and rain in Venice, the musty smell of the wool market, the heat and dust in India... even the discomfort of the car seat in Italy, where I sat to paint.... these images are better memory-joggers than any photo could ever be.

Monday, 9 January 2012

LOST AND FOUND EDGES

LOST AND FOUND

No, I don’t mean how to find that sketchbook or brush you have lost and been looking for, although I have to say, there is some kind of science-fiction “black hole” in my studio;  I can have something in my hand one minute, and I answer the phone, go back to wherever I left my pen, brush or pencil, and it has completely disappeared. Never to be seen again.   So infuriating, happens all the time.

Anyway……I’d like to give a little thought to enhancing our awareness of “lost and found”  edges.  When we were kids, we drew everything with equally firm edges – boundaries –felt safe and comfy to have something to "colour in",  but the more experienced we become as artists, the more we need to let go of the need to enclose everything with a careful edge.  (unless we are cartoonists of course....)

Squinting helps a lot;  when we squint, we become aware that while many objects in a scene may well have a nicely sharp, delineated edge, (a “found” edge),  in other areas the shape we see actually DISSOLVES into the background, not necessarily because there is a shadow there, but often because it is similar in tone or colour to the background.  When this happens, softening, or “losing” the edge will help to link the shape with its background, and will encourage more of a visual “flow” within the image.

I know that many of my students had a fear of softening, or losing, edges –they would carefully draw an object in a scene, making sure it was "right" before moving on to the next object.  They were not aware of the visual links with the surrounding objects, because they weren't looking at them!  However,  actually, your drawing or painting WILL make sense without all the edges carefully shown, because the viewer will understand the shape of the “found” part of the object, and his or her brain will do the rest and will assume the rest of the image. It is really important not to underestimate the intelligence of your viewer!   Take a look at the beautiful drawing by Rico Lebrun (1900-1964), (above) done in pencil ink and chalk:
The shaded head is obviously the focal point of the drawing.  However, we completely understand the "lost" parts of the figure, lines deliberately left out in the arms and legs, in order to draw even more emphasis to that expressive head. the white of the paper "links" with the figure because of the lack of hard lines. Do we assume that the poor person had no left hand, and no feet?  Of course not.


 In fact, when we come to creating a full colour painting,  this losing of edges and visual linking of shapes is a very powerful tool, an important part of pictorial composition, and needs to considered continuously.
I am slightly uncomfortable, after showing that divine drawing above, to show one of my marketplace sketches, but I will have to live with it!  In this scene, which is a pencil and watercolour sketch, you can see that I used the watercolour washes to "lose" some edges, allowing them to blend together, while keeping others sharp and crisp.  Probably too many crisp edges here and some too-dark tones.......but hey, it was a very hot day, I was in the middle of a busy Spanish market painting on the spot, so please give me a bit of a break!  And also, please don't ask me why he has what looks like a portable radio hanging in front of his face....I am blowed if I know what it is now.......


Finally, here is one of my still life pastel images, notice in this one how the left side of the teapot,and red box,  and the right side of the large red bowl, dissolve into the darkness behind.  I wanted to make the red and black objects and background flow together visually. I could actually see the back of the bowl and the back of the teapot irl, so I squinted REALLY hard...   Anyway, imagine if I had painted each object with all edges showing clearly;   It would not have had the same atmosphere at all.


When doing your sketches, or composing your paintings, do try to use the principles of "lost and found" to make more visual links and reduce the isolation of objects within a scene.  This will create more visual impact.